» » Doctor Who Time and the Rani: Part One (1963–1989)

Doctor Who Time and the Rani: Part One (1963–1989) Online

Doctor Who Time and the Rani: Part One (1963–1989) Online
Original Title :
Time and the Rani: Part One
Genre :
TV Episode / Adventure / Drama / Family / Sci-Fi
Year :
1963–1989
Directror :
Andrew Morgan
Cast :
Sylvester McCoy,Bonnie Langford,Kate O'Mara
Writer :
Jane Baker,Pip Baker
Type :
TV Episode
Time :
25min
Rating :
5.1/10
Doctor Who Time and the Rani: Part One (1963–1989) Online

The Rani, needing the Doctor's expertise, shoots down his TARDIS, crash-landing it on planet Lykertya where the Doctor dies and subsequently regenerates. She biochemically induces selective amnesia before disguising herself as Mel in order to angle him deceptively into repairing one of her broken machines. The real Mel? Left behind in the TARDIS, alive but unconscious, where she's found by a grim rebel Lakertyan who then makes off with her.
Episode cast overview:
Sylvester McCoy Sylvester McCoy - The Doctor
Bonnie Langford Bonnie Langford - Melanie
Kate O'Mara Kate O'Mara - The Rani
Mark Greenstreet Mark Greenstreet - Ikona
Donald Pickering Donald Pickering - Beyus
Karen Clegg Karen Clegg - Sarn
Richard Gauntlett Richard Gauntlett - Urak

Originally, the Sixth Doctor was to have regenerated at the end of this serial. The script had the Doctor staying behind at the Rani's headquarters to ensure nothing went wrong with the missile strike. The ensuing explosion causes him to regenerate. Colin Baker agreed to a regeneration, only if he would feature in the whole of the season (not just one of four serials) and then leave at the end of the season. Neither party could come to an agreement, hence the Sixth Doctor's unceremonious demise.

New CGI title sequence was used for the first time, costing £20,000. The appearance of the Doctor's face was originally designed differently. It started as a skull build up developing into a head, but this was considered too sinister and dropped. However, it was accidentally broadcast with part four of the story. It was changed to the correct version for the BBC video release.

Sylvester McCoy was the first actor to play two incarnations of The Doctor. In 1987, Colin Baker refused to film a regeneration sequence after being dropped from the lead role, so McCoy donned a blond wig and portrayed an unconscious 6th Doctor just prior to his transformation into Doctor #7. The second actor to play two different versions of the Doctor was Richard E. Grant, having played The "Quite Handsome" 10th Doctor in the BBC Comic Relief charity spoof Comic Relief: Doctor Who - The Curse of Fatal Death (1999). He then went on to voice the 9th Doctor in the BBC web animation Doctor Who: Scream of the Shalka (2003).

It been alleged that the writers Pip and Jane Baker fell out with the script editor over creative issues.

The first appearance of Sylvester McCoy as the Doctor.

This serial was originally written with The Sixth Doctor in mind. Following Colin Baker's dismissal, it was hastily rewritten to accommodate The Seventh Doctor.

John Nathan-Turner originally preferred not to include the regeneration. Urak would turn over the unconscious Doctor to reveal his new face. He later changed his mind.

The original pre-title scene had Albert Einstein kidnapped by The Rani.

For the first and only time, Sylvester McCoy wears braces with his costume. He regretted this, as it did injustice to the appearance of his tummy, giving him a "beer gut" look.

Director Andrew Morgan was not satisfied with his own work on this serial.

The working title for this story was Strange Matter.

Andrew Cartmel has said that there were many things he disliked about the script which lacked depth, "This was a story which wasn't about anything-and, frustratingly, it was Sylvester McCoy's debut."

The concept of creating a weapon by collecting the minds of all the great thinkers, including the Doctor's, was also used in the unfinished and unbroadcast story "Shada". Both stories involve the Doctor using his stolen consciousness to counteract the weapon.

One reason for the story's problems was that Pip and Jane Baker had no idea who would be playing the new Doctor or how he would be characterised - and, at least when they started work on the project, the series had no script editor for them to discuss things with.

This is the first time the Doctor is seen regenerating at the beginning of a serial, as opposed to its end (barring recap footage, of course).

The role Beyus was first offered to Don Henderson.

Clifford Rose, George Baker, T.P. McKenna, John Fraser, Ronald Lacey, Michael Gothard and Kenneth Colley were considered for Beyus.

In a behind-the-scenes interview featuring Sylvester McCoy, he jabbed at having to wear Colin Baker's over-sized wardrobe before switching into his Doctor's new clothes. Aside from donning the loud colours of his predecessor, the costume was tailored to Baker's height, 6ft (183cm), which loosely fit his smaller height of 5ft 6in (168cm). He humorously protested about "getting lost for three days" inside the floppy fabrics.

Sylvester McCoy protested about wearing the question mark jumper. It wasn't until his reprisal of the Seventh Doctor in Le seigneur du temps (1996) that his campaigning to discard the pullover was generously granted. He instead wore a red waistcoat (And was ironically "killed" before he could get any significant screen time wearing the waistcoat) .

The Tetraps are based on bats.

One of the least popular Docteur Who (1963) stories, fans voted this the sixth worst story of the entire run in fan site Outpost Gallifrey's 40th anniversary poll in 2003.

Originally The Doctor was to regenerate at the end of the episode in an explosion. The Rani disguised as Mel tells The Doctor that he had regenerated in a explosion which gave him his post regeneration trauma.

This serial was released by the BBC on video cassette in the UK in July 1995.

This episode was watched by 5.1 million viewers on its original transmission.

During the regeneration, the exercise bike the Sixth Doctor rides in "Terror of the Vervoids" is visible in the TARDIS control room. In Issue 409 of Doctor Who Magazine, in an article on regeneration, the writer suggests that the Sixth Doctor's "mortal" injury may have been caused by him falling off the bike. However, the explanation offered in the Big Finish story "The Brink of Death" gives the Sixth Doctor a dignified death and negates this possibility. The same can be said for the novel "Spiral Scratch", which was the first depiction of the regeneration until being re-designated as an alternate continuity by the release of the audio story.

It is unclear why The Doctor regenerated. It is assumed that he had hit his head when The Rani attacked the TARDIS. The Doctor hitting his hard may had done serious damage that it seemed.


User reviews

Brick my own

Brick my own

Time and the Rani is widely regarded as one of the worst Doctor Who stories of all time. It's one that the fans use to joke about bad stories. But I don't feel that way.

OK, sure, there is no way I could claim this is one of the best stories ever but in my mind it is far from the worst. I fear the regeneration scene is the biggest cause for the bad reputation. Wig-gate is a massive error which could have been avoided. The rest though is pretty much the best that could be done. How do you do a regeneration scene without the actor present and without the modern ability to use CGI? There is no way it can be satisfactory. The writers probably gathered this and got it over with quickly and didn't make it the main use of the story.

Once that gets out of the way though, it is not bad at all. Both McCoy and O'Mara act their socks off- McCoy gives us a fun new Doctor and O'Mara gives us round two of the fearsome Rani, with an impression of what Mel ought to be like to boot. The story is packed full of neat ideas too- it's really unusual for an alien race to be conflicted over whether to act with or against a villain, for instance.

There is too much technobabble, and the story does drag a bit but how many times have I said that before? Many would have expected a true post-regeneration story with the companion getting to know the new Doctor but this isn't that. Production problems meant the regeneration was ruined and the writers made the probably correct choice in not making the regeneration the focus of the story.

It's all about personal opinion but I disagree with the majority here. It's like when I thought Genesis of the Daleks wasn't as good as everyone thought. Controversial it may be, but I think Time and the Rani is better than it is given credit for.
invincible

invincible

Doctor Who: Time and the Rani: Part 1 starts as the TARDIS is struck by several laser-beams which force it to land on the inhospitable planet of Lakertya & causes the Doctor (Sylvetser McCoy) to regenerate for the seventh time while his companion Mel (Bonnie Langford) is knocked unconscious. It turns out that the evil Timelord the Rani (Kate O'Mara) was responsible for forcing the TARDIS to land & it's all part of a sinister plan, she kidnaps the Doctor & gives him an injection which gives him amnesia in an attempt to trick him that she is in fact Mel when he wakes up so she can convince him to work on her evil scheme. Meanwhile the real Mel is lost on the surface of Lakertya together with Ikona (Mark Greenstreet) a rebel Lakertyan who is trying to save his race from the Rani & her evil ways...

This Doctor Who adventure was episode 1 from season 24 that aired here in the UK during late 1987 & was the first story for Sylvester McCoy as the Doctor, directed by Andrew Morgan I don't think there's a lot of love floating around for Time and the Rani but I have to say I quite liked this first episode. The new Doctor Sylvester McCoy is rather more restrained & less theatrical than Colin Baker & has slightly more about him than a sometimes flat Peter Davison, he ain't the best Doctor but he's decent enough all the same. The script by Pip & Jane Baker is alright, not much is made of the regeneration scene & the new Doctor doesn't take long to get going. I thought the story was quite fun & I liked the interplay between the Rani & the Doctor as she impersonates Mel, there's also some monsters lurking around that haven't been completely revealed yet. I also have to say that this particular episode has a terrific cliffhanger ending. It's not brilliant by any means but I thought it was mildly entertaining & quite fun which isn't a bad return when you think about it.

Being a BBC production the budget was probably low but it has to be said apart from a terrible opening sequence of the TARDIS being shot at in space the special effects aren't too bad actually, the spinning bubble traps that the Rani has set up look rather good & while we haven't seen the creatures completely yet so far they seem to look OK & the way they are shot deliberately not showing them adds to their effectiveness.

Time and the Rani wasn't as bad as I'd had been lead to believe it would be, in fact I'd go as far as to say I quite liked it & I'm looking forward to see the following three episodes.
Coiriel

Coiriel

This is widely criticised and is often put forward as a leading contender to be rated as the worst story in Doctor Who history. I am sadly in agreement that it is pretty close to the bottom of the pile although, for me, there are a few stories worse than this. There are a couple of positives so this is not as abysmal as some of the rubbish you get on TV but for this show it is very poor.

The previous two seasons with Colin Baker as the 6th Doctor had been the two lowest quality seasons by far up to this point in many people's opinion (mine included). A number of changes were made for this new season to try to improve things but what actually resulted was a season that I think is clearly even worse. Thankfully the following season would be a big improvement and the one after that was really brilliant but season 24 for me stands as the lowest point of all.

One of the changes made was to replace Colin Baker against his will and bring in Sylvester McCoy as the 7th Doctor. Well in reality Baker's characterisation was a big issue in his era but that was largely down to the writing and instructions he was given. His often pompous, bad tempered, rude and conceited Doctor either needed a character overhaul or a replacement and it makes sense they replaced him but it lead to him refusing to film a regeneration scene. Therefore we get a weird and unsatisfying scenario where the episode begins with the TARDIS under attack and the Doctor lying on the floor before regenerating in a disappointing way whilst unconscious and being taken prisoner by renegade Timelord/Time Lady the Rani.

After his capture the Doctor awakes and for his first episode McCoy is pretty embarrassing. There are bad pratfalls, clowning about and unconvincing delivery of lame dialogue, malapropisms and jokes. A lot of people comment on him playing the spoons but I have no issue with that any more than I have an issue with the 2nd Doctor playing the recorder (badly). At least he is very good at playing the spoons haha! What is a problem is the writing and, initially McCoy's acting. Thankfully this turns out to be perhaps partly just nerves as he does improve over parts 2 to 4 of the story. Sadly the characterisation has gone from unpleasant and annoying with Baker to overly silly with McCoy proving it is the writing and showrunner John Nathan-Turner which are to blame for this nadir. Andrew Cartmel had come in as script editor and seemingly brought about improvements in seasons 25 and 26 by which time McCoy had become very good but in this story and whole of season 24 things are in bad shape. I will say though McCoy after his initial bad acting becomes quickly far more likeable and engaging than Baker was so it turns out to be one positive change.

The plot is nonsensical - The Rani has great minds such as Einstein and Pasteur as well as the Doctor and intends amalgamating their minds into a giant brain and get them to formulate a way to create a powerful substance and fire a rocket of that substance into an asteroid composed of strange matter. It is as illogical, confused and silly as it sounds. The Rani is exploiting a race called the Lakertyans with the help of another race the Tetraps. The Tetraps are not a bad monster in design, their heads and tongues are reasonably good but when allied to a pantomime costume type body and very human sounding voices delivering cliche baddie dialogue it makes them poor. The Lakertyans look rubbish and are boring but Donald Pickering and Wanda Ventham are fine actors and imbue their meagre roles with as much gravitas as possible.

Kate O'Mara as the Rani is camp and pantomime in many ways as a character but is genuinely good and enjoyable in the role. Her impersonation of Bonnie Langford when in disguise as Mel is amazingly accurate too. Langford herself is given little to do other than scream hysterically or chip in simpering inanities so is an irritating presence.

This does not all look cheap, there are some good effects like the spinning, exploding sphere traps and efforts have been made with sets but they sadly just look garish and do not improve on the overall lack of quality in writing and very poor action scenes of people awkwardly falling over and clowning about. There is a little bit of mindless fun in the middle but it becomes boring by the end.

Very disappointing. 4/10
Kison

Kison

A story I've knocked over the years, but watching it again after several years, I think I was perhaps a little overly harsh.

It's a slightly bitter episode, particularly for a fan of Colin Baker like myself, but I love McCoy too, so his entrance is welcome, even if his first scenes aren't great.

So Part one, I'm genuinely impressed by the concept of the story, I love Lakertya, and its stylish inhabitants, and some of the effects are particularly good, the flying spheres in particular look great.

On the downside the regeneration scene is awful, the fluffy monsters are bad, but worst of all is Kate O'Mara, she was sublime in her previous story, Mark of the Rani, she was slick, sexy and menacing, in this one she feels a little panto somehow.

I get why people don't like it, but I think it's a decent start. 6/10
Vinainl

Vinainl

I know many fans regard this story as being pretty poor. In my opinion it's not as awful as people make out. It just lacks sparkle for an opening adventure for the new Doctor. I also feel that a lot of the behind the scenes troubles of the time contributed to a fairly lacklustre set of episodes. Colin Baker did not wish to reprise the role for one last story and we were therefore left with the less than satisfactory situation of having Sylvester McCoy wearing a wig for the regeneration sequence. Not a great start! The story is however, notable for a new title sequence and new incidental music. The first computer generated title sequence looked pretty impressive at the time. Also the visual effects look good too. So basically the story's visuals cannot be faulted. However the script itself perhaps doesn't deliver an exciting story that was required for the debut of a new actor playing the role. It was obviously going to take time for Sylvester McCoy to settle into the role. In this first story he comes across a bit like an absent minded professor type. However, as the stories became a bit darker later on, Sylvester McCoy's portrayal became more serious and thoughtful. 7/10.