Urok (2014) Online

THE LESSON is one of the mini-budget films (this one from Bulgaria) that packs a solid wallop in story without all the fancy trappings and star studded cast of the big budget films that focus on CGI, noise, and paranormal themes. Kristina Grozeva and Petar Valchanov both wrote and directed this film, a work of cinematic expression that is gaining honors wherever it is shown –and for good reasons. And once again we are indebted to Film Movement for taking up the banner for this worthy film.

In a small Bulgarian town Nadezhda (Margita Gosheva), a young teacher, is looking for the culprit of an innocent child-theft between classmates in her class so she can teach him a lesson about right and wrong. But when she gets in debt to loan sharks, can she find the right way out herself? Nade is an honest, hard-working elementary school teacher struggling to keep her life together. With the home she shares with her husband and young daughter on the brink of repossession and no money to her name Nade resorts to measures her former self, untouched by the realities of economic desperation and moral compromise, would have found depraved, as she makes one last extreme effort to secure the money she needs.

The film moves slowly, allowing the viewer to absorb all the subtle statements about life in a post-communist state. It is a moment of examining the strength of women and schoolteachers that is wholly universal. The actress Margita Gosheva is astonishing fine in the manner in which she portrays this scrupulously honest woman who faces more obstacles that most. She makes Nade credible and lovable. This is a very strong film that deserves a wide audience.

This is extraordinarily good film-making aimed at an intelligent audience. The plot revolves around an ordinary woman who undergoes a banal yet tremendous crisis alone, left to her own devices, without a helping hand. In a sense it is the story of most women, mothers, unrecognized heroes who make the magic illusion of a normal life happen for their children in a dog eat dog world. The main actress is splendid as she portrays a rather restrained, generic middle school teacher who has certain fixed ideas about what is correct and honorable. Sudden danger to the core of her family puts her through a series of trials which force her, and us, to examine easy assumptions about honor and behavior.

Anything that can go wrong, WILL go wrong! An epigram for tragedy when it strikes on a seemingly constant basis, Murphy's Law can be appropriately applied to many scenarios in life when things seem to never go right. Simply and subtly, the country of Bulgaria transcends the adage into a piece of fine cinema that is The Lesson.

Held together by an impressive lead Nade (Margita Gosheva), The Lesson is a sturdy little micro- budget film about the financial hardships of rural Bulgaria and the daily struggle undertaken by the population to stay safely nestled in their homes and off the streets.

The Lesson begins and ends in Nade's classroom to be exact. Nade is a schoolteacher who begins her newest lesson trying to catch the culprit of an innocent child-theft between classmates; someone has stolen their classmate's wallet. Nade is intent on finding the thief and teaching them a lesson, fearing that this behaviour will transcend into the culprit's adult life and lead to more severe consequences. One of the first, if not only things we need to know about Nade is that she is an honest schoolteacher who has a deep-rooted moral and ethical compass.

Times are tough for Nade, her husband and young daughter. Barely able to afford bus fare, she arrives home one day to discover money that should have gone towards their debt has been sunk into repairs for a gearbox for a trailer her husband has repeatedly failed to sell. We learn later that this trailer doesn't just take up a seemingly permanent space on their front lawn, but acts as a metaphorical barrier between the family and the rest of the world. Tasked to make good on their debts within three days or face seeing her families worldly possessions on the auction block, Nade sets aside her better judgement and gets into business with some shady individuals to try to pay the money back, hoping to return order to her household and family life in the process.

When Nade's seemingly ordinary life couldn't seem to be getting any worse, directors Kristina Grozeva and Petar Valchanov take the very square lens of their camera, set against the rigid frames of doorways, window panes and hallways and show the reshuffled chaos entering the life of a hard-working member of a small town. Shot exceptionally well despite its lack of funding, The Lesson is a reminder that films don't need much money to look good. Adopting a quality over quantity approach, the film is a slow-burning, almost documentary-type account of the real-life tragedy that could easily plague anyone in a world of economic uncertainty.

The true star of the film is Nade, the lead played in a calm and collected manner by Margita Gosheva. Gosheva is the film's heart, soul and patience who allows for audiences to engage for as long as possible, without ever wanting to doze off. Her interpretation of Nade is a very grungy and stripped one of a very overwhelmed character; who even in the face of homelessness and threats of blackmail never sidelines her ego and pride. We come to learn that Nade's integrity is the real star of The Lesson.

What's most refreshing about the film is it's ability to write a strong female character that doesn't need to wear a cape or conquer otherworldly elements to be the glue that holds the film together. Although she never breaks down in tears, Gosheva's subtle trembling body is enough for us to physically feel the emotional toll the situation is taking on her character. Gosheva has an uncanny ability to force audiences to empathize with her during moments of complete strain and grit, although finds solace and peace while in her classroom–highlighting the stark differences in her acting abilities quite well on a moments notice.

Thankfully, in a very obvious yet equally poignant last few frames, the film allows the world of Nade's shaken life to come full circle in ways she never thought possible. The lesson at hand transforms Nade's quest for clarity into a much greater journey of understanding, self-discovery and compassion that Nade will take with her for the rest of her life. It is these last delicate and quaint commentaries that allow The Lesson to be a film that we might not want to revisit anytime soon but a lecture in film-making we won't soon forget.

"The Lesson" has recently received acclaim of almost poignant proportions, empathising with the drama of the schoolteacher heroine in a valueless post-communist state. Being Bulgarian, I can attest to the dramatic existence of teachers here, and would reiterate the fact the film is based on a true story. While the meager pay and monstrosity of society, hence youth's behaviour, is enough to drive one insane, I feel there's a fact which the film treats leniently, and in my eyes, illogically. The pillar of the family, teacher Nadya, is successful in keeping things together (even if unpaid for the side job she does) - until her house is broken into by debt collectors due to her husband skipping monthly payments, while misinforming her all had been fine. Whether she should have confronted him might be debatable, if holding spousal loyalty on a pedestal (which is in my opinion exactly what the film does), yet it is astonishing she should unquestionably take it all upon herself to fix the situation; if that is not enough, her junky-camper-enthusiast husband (far more detracted than, say, Jim Broadbent in Life Is Sweet) scolds her when he finds out she had resorted to a loan shark. The real tragedy the film conveys is that of, I dare say, the average Bulgarian woman who stoically puts up with the often good-for-nothing drunk or slacker husband, because... (here steps the lack of logic, and the lack of questioning by the audiences in Bulgaria). In the real-life story, the teacher had even won a Green card, and had everything ready in order to depart, when the husband got into a drunk-drive accident, nearly killing a passenger. The real heroine is apparently still dragging him on, while having made yet another relative success of her life, now in France. (She had got a 18-month suspended sentence for her crime.) Inadvertently, this film is a testimony of patriarchal post-Ottoman morals, superimposed with the post-Soviet narrative of a woman as crane-operator, or other industrial hero who is also head of the family and pillar of society (after the Mother Russia mythologem) - here being forced to disintegrate. Even statistics beat the myth, with Bulgaria nearing the bottom of worldwide birth rate's table, with war-torn countries above us. The acting of Margita Gosheva is superb if schematic (and her resemblance of the real-life heroine amazing), due to either storytelling shortcomings or intention. I agree with the NY Times reviewer that the story might have been more vivid and character-driven: we still are clueless as to Nadya's emotional landscape, as if it should not even be our concern. For generations, Bulgarians have been raised by being sworn to secrecy and the stiff-upper-lip, while having also been taught obedience: potentially an explosive character mix, which however tends to implode; a process the film registers. We cannot but admire the tight-lipped portrayal of survival-genius overtaking the heroine's inherent femininity. (For an introspection to womanhood, see Margita Gosheva's equally impressive previous role in Three Days in Sarajevo.) My review might be slightly unappreciative, while the filmmakers' intent at a humorous approach to the otherwise gritty story justifies the schematism/intellectual detachment, and is both refreshing and admirable.

This intense and powerful Bulgarian drama proved to be a most pleasant surprise. It's filled with dark twists and turns, and kept me in suspense to the final scenes as to how this would all turn out.

Margita Gosheva is terrific here as Nade, a no-nonsense teacher of English at a Bulgarian school. She's living with her no-goodnik husband Mladen and her adorable 4-year-old daughter Andrea.

After trying to deal with a suspected thief in her classroom, Nade returns home, one day, to find a court officer there, who advises her that due to non-payment of their mortgage there will be an auction of their house in 3 days, unless they can come up with all the arrearages by then.

Nade is shocked and eventually finds out from her husband that he bought a gear box for their camper and never paid their mortgage payments. This will set off a series of events that just get wilder and darker, as the desperate Nade tries to raise the cash to save her house. At times, watching these events I was riveted to the screen, while at the same time feeling infuriated at how some of them played out.

The movie is most ably written and directed by Bulgarian filmmakers Kristina Grozeva and Petar Valchanov, and along with some fine realistic acting by the cast, led by Gosheva, I thought this was one of those gems that you find every so often.

Nade is a school teacher of teenagers; her husband is a man who dotes on their daughter but also on the drink bottle. His nefarious carryings on have plummeted them into serious debt. She also has a side line in translating Bulgarian documents into English. Then one day one of her students has her purse stolen. It is obviously one of the class who is the culprit but Nade is unable to get them to fess up.

Now she is presented with some stark choices as to how to pay off her debts and so begins a very harrowing and exhausting as well as emotionally draining journey that had me increasingly gripped.

I have seen some comments that this is a slow start and I have to agree. However, you need to set the ground rules in order for the later events to have the fullest impact and I must say this really delivers. It is in Bulgarian and a bit of English, and runs to 111 minutes; it has also won a slew of awards and I have to say they are all completely deserved – recommended to lovers of European cinema and those who like their films to be a bit deeper.

From main characters to small cameos, the acting in The Lesson is excellent, with an understated but seriously dangerous loan shark, a layabout husband who is nevertheless wonderful with the family's small child, and even nuanced bank clerks. However, I can only rate it 4 because this feels like a 30 minute short story that has been slowly and excruciatingly dragged out way beyond its natural length. I wasn't aware before watching that it is based on a true story but weirdly, some of the real moments of action are not even shown and it is the build up and constant journeying around the area - by coach, car, and on foot) that appear endless. Having watched the trailer, don't be misled into thinking that the action is typical. The trailer is, of course genuine, but it feels as though another trailer would have completed the story.

Nadezhda is an elementary school teacher in a Bulgarian town. Somebody in the class has stolen money from another of her students. She tries to teach them a lesson and let the money be returned in secret. Her unemployed drunken husband wasted their mortgage payments. The bank raised their interest rate and threatens to take their home. Her father has a much younger woman after her mother's death. She is forced to borrow from a loan shark. The loan is coming due and she has no money to repay it. She is offered an unsavory solution. As she tries to out the thief in her class, she is coming to terms with her own immoral decision.

It's a nice moral dilemma. The filmmaking is a bit weak. There are scenes missing that could elevate the drama. The obvious missing piece is the child thief. This movie is screaming for two side-by-side storytelling. The kid stealing the money could be a great second plot. Missing that, the movie still has a great idea. The ending has some poignancy but it doesn't push the tension to its limits. There are missing scenes that could really raise the intensity.

The movie was low budget, and it had subtitles... 2 of the things I really dislike. However, it was interesting. I wanted to watch it, even though it was slow, I still wanted to see what would happen at the end. And then the end leaves you kind of hanging. Ughhh! So frustrating. I would have liked to have seen a real ending to it. Anyway, it was still interesting, so I gave it 5 stars. The acting was excellent. It was believable and the main actress captures your attention. For a low budget film, the filming was good. It was directed well. You really could relate to the main character and put yourself in her shoes. A few parts of it didn't make sense though, but for the most part, the movie flowed nicely from one scene to the next.

It was not easy to watch this woman's struggle. She was 'blessed' with that incompetent, stupid and alcoholic (a very nice combo) husband of hers and the situation she got into because of him. What I didn't understand is why did she have to bear the whole burden on her own? Her useless husband didn't do much and she was the only one who tried to solve the situation. This I didn't understand. The other thing that I didn't comprehend is why she had to be so pride when she went to ask for money from her father? I totally understand that she didn't like him and blamed him for past events but still in her hopeless situation he would have been willing to give her the required money. I wanted to stop watching the film after the loan shark made her the 'offer' how she could pay her debts because I was sure that she ended up a prostitute. Well, it wasn't the case because she robbed a bank instead, hahha. So the ending wasn't that tragical because she could temporarily solve the problem with the loan shark but what happened after that? Did she live happily ever after? I doubt it. Maybe she was found by the police or if she wasn't she spent her days wondering when they get to her. It is an exciting movie nonetheless but also a very sad one.

An elementary school teacher/lawyer Nadezhda(Margita Gosheva)shows her meddle. The plot opens with Nate doing a moral lesson with her English class students one of whom stole some cash. From the beginning Nate is willful and determined to make the thief confess and return the money. Nate is married to something of a loser ( Petar Valchanovwho) has spent their house payment money unsuccessfully trying to fix up and flip motor home. Nate finds this out when the bank officer comes to arrange an auction and foreclosure.

The movie moves slowly with location filming and no music. It never drags or bores and there is plenty of film craft things like visual symbols to keep your mind busy...one that stood out is a wall portrait glamour shot of Nate looking like a determined Joan Crawford. There is a down to earth somewhat feminist tone to Nate but not at all exaggerated or in your face.

The plot though not humorous has a situational Murphy's law logic to it. what can go wrong does at just the wrong time. There were a couple weak unbelievable moments in the plot one where Nate needs 50 cents to save her mortgage and the tellers don't offer to give it to her. The bank heist was a deus ex machina ending. But the movie is such good quality you have no trouble over looking this.

Anyway a great look at Bulgaria and its culture. A movie carried totally by the main actors and decent location filming and directing.

RECOMMEND