» » Bleeding Hearts (1994)

Bleeding Hearts (1994) Online

Bleeding Hearts (1994) Online
Original Title :
Bleeding Hearts
Genre :
Movie / Drama / Romance
Year :
1994
Directror :
Gregory Hines
Cast :
Mark Evan Jacobs,Karen Kirkland,Ruben Santiago-Hudson
Writer :
Allison Burnett
Type :
Movie
Time :
1h 32min
Rating :
5.9/10
Bleeding Hearts (1994) Online

A white liberal teacher and his 17-year-old African-American female student fall deeply in love with tragic consequences.
Cast overview, first billed only:
Mark Evan Jacobs Mark Evan Jacobs - Lonny Baum
Karen Kirkland Karen Kirkland - Denise Sheperd
Ruben Santiago-Hudson Ruben Santiago-Hudson - Todd
Melina Kanakaredes Melina Kanakaredes - Daphne
Diane Kagan Diane Kagan - Mrs. Baum
Lorraine Toussaint Lorraine Toussaint - Enid Sheperd
Ranjit Chowdhry Ranjit Chowdhry - Fred Ghosh
Robert Levine Robert Levine - Mel Shankman
Charles Malik Whitfield Charles Malik Whitfield - Donny Stewart
Yvette Thor Yvette Thor - Jan
Elliott Gould Elliott Gould - Mr. Baum
Robert Redcross Robert Redcross - Businessman (as Bobby Redcross)
Harvey Waldman Harvey Waldman - Cab Driver
Meredith Scott Lynn Meredith Scott Lynn - Ruthie
Peter Timothy Shaw Peter Timothy Shaw - Jogger

Film debut of Melina Kanakaredes.

Filmed entirely in Brooklyn, New York


User reviews

Little Devil

Little Devil

This movie, directed by Gregory Hines, disguises itself as an ill-fated, tender romance between an adult, male, white tutor (Mark Evan Jacobs) and his 17-year-old, African-American, female student (the excellent Karen Kirkland), but it's not. Oh, it has all the elements of a sweet inappropriate romance, and the leads do an excellent job of creating a very believable love affair. The chemistry between the two is quite strong, and in another movie you would forget completely that they are an inter-racial couple, becoming instead caught up in the bond that these two actors share.

(CAUTION: what follows, gives details about the movie, INCLUDING THE ENDING, that might spoil the picture for those who haven't seen it. Also, the content of the movie discussed is adult in nature).

You won't however, be able to get too caught up in that in this movie. Instead you are dragged, unwittingly and unhappily into a commentary by Director Hines about the evils of the white man intruding into an innocent African-American world. I know it sounds racist, and it is.

(!!! Again, caution; this gives away the ending !!!)

Consider the final moments of the film. Jacobs is invited to dinner, by the begrudging mother of Kirkland. The mother disapproves of the relationship, but is beginning to relent because her daughter is seemingly upset to the point of illness by her lack of contact with Jacobs (actually she is physically ill, but not for that reason). As Jacobs knocks to no avail on Kirkand's door, a neighbor tells him that Kirkland has been rushed to the hospital. Jacobs rushes to the hospital and finds Kirkland's mother falling to the floor, wailing in agony. Jacobs finds out, from a doctor, that Kirkland has died because the sexually transmitted disease (Chlamydia) Jacobs gave her caused an infection brought about by an abortion she had two days prior. The baby was Jacobs' and Kirkland was a virgin when he met her, by the way.

Totally devastated, Jacobs leaves the hospital, and while stumbling down the street, a passing Limo driver offers a ride for $10.00. Dazed, Jacobs falls into the Limo like a rag doll, catatonic with grief. Here he is treated to the following story from the white driver... It seems the driver makes excursions to jungle areas where black native girls who (because of poverty) are willing to have sex with Americans (he has videos to sell, too!). Young girls who (in the driver's words) "[will] do anything. They're not whores, they're just poor. These jungle girls are almost virgins, and they don't have any of our diseases yet." I almost threw a brick at my television!

I might not have been so mad if the movie had ended with Jacobs wandering down the street. Because, I might have thought that Hines meant to denounce romance between girls in their late teens and adult men, or any adult and a young person (actually Kirkland turns 18 before all the grief happens, so technically she is an adult). That is a message I could have agreed with. Anyone can agree that these kinds of romances are inappropriate, ill-fated and downright criminal if the person is under 18. But the final words by the driver, reveal that Hines has a whole different message in mind.

What other message can we construe than this one? That Jacobs, the evil white pedophile, had intruded on the innocent, poor and pure black world of Kirkland's and destroyed everything. Just like the vile white American men that trek to jungle nations to have sex with poor, black, innocent girls. Indeed, like all evil white devils.

This movie is the anti-thesis to "Guess who's coming to dinner?". Hines, very obviously, is telling us that white and black do NOT mix. It wasn't enough that we had to suffer Kirkland's untimely death, and the agony of her mother. We had to have the film's racist, moral conclusion crammed down our throat, in very harsh and blunt terms. Why? Is there some statement about society that could bring some understanding or healing or just plain information? I don't see any. It just smacks of the basest type of racism; threatening of tragic consequences if the races mix.

If anyone comes away with a different message than this, please email me with your take. I'd welcome it, because this movie hurt me. It sets you up with a romance-drama theme and then drops the roof on you with bigoted aplomb. This is just hardcore racism; "Don't mix the races, or tragedy ensues!" And this theme, as you look back over the whole movie, is pervasive throughout. It is not present just in the heartbreaking ending.

I read an article once, while researching for a study I did on black and white racial issues in college, that has similarities with this film. It was in a little known Texas magazine for African-Americans that was published by a group of white persons (I'm sure African-Americans of the time said "gee, thanks"... NOT). The article was called "Are White Women Stealing Our Men?". It was supposedly a gentle tirade by African American women about how good African-American men were being taken by white women. Actually it was a not-to-subtle warning to African American men about dating white women. The tone of the article was very terrifying when you started to get the real message of the piece. Right there, in a African-American person's magazine was an article by white men, warning them to stay away from white women.

This movie shares elements with that article, as it also disguises itself as something it is actually the opposite of. Presented as a tender, wrongful romance between two people. Instead it is a mean-spirited statement that white people (intentionally) only bring destruction to African-American people. And both the article and this movie have the same closing admonishment... "Stay away! We don't want you devils around us!". Except in the article it is spoken by white people and in the movie it is spoken by an African-American. No matter who says the words, it still sickens. And in this movie it adds a little cinematic grief and heartache to the mix, just to grind it in.

Watch this movie for the excellent acting and chemistry between Kirkland and Jacobs (little else is good, except the brief performance of Kirkland's mother, the always awesome Lorraine Toussaint). But be ready to be hit over the head HARD in the end with heartbreak and a racist conclusion.
BroWelm

BroWelm

This is one of the best, certainly one the most honest, black-themed films I have ever seen. It is easy to call it racist, especially when you do not bother to define this near-meaningless term. Despite what the previous commentator thinks, whites have historically functioned in a thoroughly negative, self-serving fashion in the lives of blacks. This film dramatizes this more effectively than any other I have seen. This is especially evident in the fact that the central male character presents himself as a liberal presuming to enlighten the young black girl while actually dealing death. It is significant that the scriptwriter has him use anti-spiritual rhetoric associated with the black militants of several decades ago. In this way, viewers are alerted to the insidious, indirect ways in which presumptuous white people and their "native" imitators impose their toxic values. This has nothing to do with politics since both right and left wing are equally poisonous and lethal. It is worth pointing out that the script is by a white writer (the man who did the interesting and very different "Red Meat") not a black one, although the late Gregory Hines, the director, is black.
Leyl

Leyl

I won't go into details, but this movie hits a real sharp point regarding the treatment of African Americans by liberals (I use this term loosely).

The story involves racial tension, specifically the type of tension you don't tend to see in these types of films...it portrays the negative consequences of one's 'do the right thing' attitude, when that attitude is misdirected. Essentially, the story revolves around a white man trying to help a black, underage girl, but gets tangled up in his own liberal ideology when trying to 'help' the poor black girl's situation.

Some reviews seem to knock the movie; however, it is well worth a watch to provoke thought, even if just for the artistic content. Although a bit dated, there are some universal themes that send a clear message.

IMHO, this is one of the best movies to portray the liberal ideology with regard to race, and illustrates the problems with high-minded, ivory tower liberal thinking that "they" can help those less fortunate souls, and that "they" know what's best for others. The movie illustrates this perspective as insensitive and self-centered.

Bleeding Hearts was a great title for this film; I highly recommend watching it. It is a little boring the first 20 minutes or so, then it picks up.