» » Codice Genesi (2010)

Codice Genesi (2010) Online

Codice Genesi (2010) Online
Original Title :
The Book of Eli
Genre :
Movie / Action / Adventure / Drama / Thriller
Year :
2010
Directror :
Albert Hughes,Allen Hughes
Cast :
Denzel Washington,Mila Kunis,Ray Stevenson
Writer :
Gary Whitta
Budget :
$80,000,000
Type :
Movie
Time :
1h 58min
Rating :
6.9/10

A post-apocalyptic tale, in which a lone man fights his way across America in order to protect a sacred book that holds the secrets to saving humankind.

Codice Genesi (2010) Online

In a violent post-apocalyptic society, a drifter, Eli, has been wandering westward across North America for the last thirty years. He finds solace in a unique book which he carries on his person and guards closely, whilst surviving by hunting small animals and seeking goods in destroyed houses and vehicles to trade in villages for water and supplies. When he reaches a village ruled by the powerful mobster, Carnegie, the man views Eli's impressive fighting skills and offers Eli a place within his gang. Carnegie presses his blind lover Claudia to send her daughter, Solara, to at least convince Eli to spend the night by sleeping with him. However, Eli proves to be the better man when he gently declines her advances. The girl sees Eli's book, and when Carnegie finds out he beats her mother until she reveals what she saw. Carnegie sends his gang into the wasteland to take the book from Eli, but the man proves to be a formidable foe as he makes it more than clear that if they want the book,...
Cast overview, first billed only:
Denzel Washington Denzel Washington - Eli
Gary Oldman Gary Oldman - Carnegie
Mila Kunis Mila Kunis - Solara
Ray Stevenson Ray Stevenson - Redridge
Jennifer Beals Jennifer Beals - Claudia
Evan Jones Evan Jones - Martz
Joe Pingue Joe Pingue - Hoyt
Frances de la Tour Frances de la Tour - Martha (as Frances De La Tour)
Michael Gambon Michael Gambon - George
Tom Waits Tom Waits - Engineer
Chris Browning Chris Browning - Hijack Leader
Richard Cetrone Richard Cetrone - Hijacker
Lateef Crowder Lateef Crowder - Hijacker / Construction Thug
Keith Splinter Davis Keith Splinter Davis - Hijacker (as Keith Davis)
Don Thai Theerathada Don Thai Theerathada - Hijacker (as Don Theerathada)

The reason the cannibals' hands shake is that they suffer from Kuru disease - a form of Creutzfeld-Jakob Disease caused by eating human brains or spinal columns. The first symptom is shaking limbs, which is why people check Eli's hands throughout the movie.

Denzel Washington performed all of his own stunts in the hand-to-hand fight sequences.

For the movie, Denzel Washington studied martial arts under Bruce Lee's protégé Dan Inosanto.

Gary Oldman was cast at the suggestion of Denzel Washington.

The film takes place in 2043.

When Eli first sits in the room Carnagie imprisons him in, a poster of the movie A Boy and His Dog (1975) is visible. A Boy and His Dog (1975) is recognized as one of the earliest post-apocalyptic movies, and a source of inspiration for many dystopian and post-apoctalyptic movies and video games.

Eli's speech before he fights Carnegie's men in the bar is taken from Genesis 3:17-19 where God expels Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden.

Denzel Washington shed about fifty pounds, in preparation for the role.

The film didn't explicitly mention that the apocalypse was because of a nuclear war; writer Gary Whitta preferred to leave clues of the apocalypse instead. There are a few clues that indicate nuclear war, like the large bomb craters the characters are sometimes near.

Kristen Stewart turned down the role of Solara, due to scheduling conflicts with The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009).

When Eli encounters a group of road bandits, behind them is a tunnel structure with a bold 14:6 written on top. Being a post-apocalyptic movie, that writing can be referenced to an apocalyptic book in the Bible, Revelation. Revelation 14:6 (King James Version): "And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people."

In Arabic, Hebrew, and Aramaic, Eli can be a variant on the name of God. The suffix "i" indicates first person singular possession, i.e., "my El" or "my God."

The first line of dialogue is spoken almost eight minutes into the film.

The quote that Eli takes from Johnny Cash at Folsom Prison is from "Greystone Chapel," last track on the album. The line comes from the last verse in the song.

The screenplay for this film was featured in the 2007 Blacklist; a list of the "most liked" unmade scripts of the year.

The cooling towers, in which Eli and Solara take refuge, are most likely the cooling towers of the former Rancho Seco Nuclear generating station outside of Sacramento, California, given the apparent travel time on foot and by vehicle before Eli and Solara reach the Golden Gate Bridge, and Carnegie returns to his town.

The names of the characters, George and Martha, are a direct reference to the play 'Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?' by Edward Albee. The play is about an elderly couple who want children so badly, they invent a dead son. Their names here are an ironic reference to the "Father and Mother" of the United States, George and Martha Washington.

After Eli defeats most of the men in Carnegie's bar, Carnegie calls down to have a word with Eli. When Eli looks up at him, there's a bloodstain in the shape of a cross on Eli's forehead.

While the antagonist of the film has the last name Carnegie, who sought out books, Andrew Carnegie was an industrialist/philanthropist in the early 20th century who donated money to communities to build libraries.

The film has many parallels to the Fallout video games, in particular Fallout 3. In both the book and the film, there is a very similar-looking apocalyptic wasteland, gangs of thugs with ambush tactics, self-contained communities, cannibal families and American landmarks being used as places of salvation. Actor Malcolm McDowell appears in both the film and the game, although their characters are not similar.

'Childhood Memories' (composer- Gheorghe Zamfir pan flute artist) was being "whistled" by the villain in the van abducting Solara after they left the church yard scene. The piece was originally composed for Sergio Leone's final film, Once Upon a Time in America (1984).

The book of Eli has nothing to do with the Biblical Character Eli. If you look closely in his back pack when Solara tries to take the book you see his Name tag from Kmart showing his name is Eli.

The sunglasses and backpack Eli used throughout the movie were Oakley brand products.

The tenth film released in select D-BOX enabled cinemas, located in the U.S and Canada. In D-BOX's words, the motion control technology "adds to the movie's plot and underlying themes of fear, terror and explosive action by offering realistic sensations during most of the film's action scenes."

A critic described the film as "Mad Max for the 21st Century". Ironically, five years later, there was a 21st century "Mad Max" movie, starring Tom Hardy.

Denzel Washington (Eli) and Jennifer Beals (Claudia) acted together previously in Devil in a Blue Dress (1995).

The headphones used by Denzel Washington are called Beats by Dr. Dre.

The vehicle, behind which Eli takes cover during the gun battle, is a Rover P6.

Lil' Wayne mentions The Book of Eli in his song "Drip".

Michael Gambon, Frances de la Tour and Gary Oldman starred in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005).

The King James Bible is roughly 789,000 words long. To write it out longhand, at twenty to thirty words per minute, it would take roughly 31,000 minutes. Assuming the writing was done for 8 hours a day, this would take 66 days to complete.

Hints to Eli's condition are shown throughout the movie: In the opening fight, he cuts the man's hand off after being pushed, waiting until he's touched to get a sense of where to direct his blow with his machete. Also he lures the rest of them in to a dark tunnel before fighting them.-In the house at the beginning, Eli looks at the sun from a window, but his eyes don't dialate. He has extraordinary hearing and sense of smell. At one point, after staying the night at the cooling tower ruins, Solara asks Eli how does he know which way to go, to which he replies "We walk by faith, not by sight". He doesn't put on his sunglasses right away when walking outside, like everyone else does (he even appears to be staring directly at the sun). In several scenes sounds of babies, shooting guns, movement and sometimes almost insignificant sounds are emphasized. He searches the shelves of the first house he checks (in the beginning of the movie, before he finds the dead body) by running his hand over them. When he finds the dead body hanging it is very clear that his shock is caused by the doors falling off the hinges, not the sight of the dead person. He even feels the body before being sure of what he is dealing with since he can't see anything. Just before finding the doors hiding the dead body, he runs into an end table with his thigh, as if he didn't see it. As he walks along the highway with Solara, he silences her so that he can hear the bird ("dinner") flying above them. At George and Martha's house, he kicks forward by the first step of the stairs to the porch with his boot so he knows where it is. He never fires his weapon first, needing to hear the sound of shooting at him to identify the location of his target, hence the reason he simply walks away after the last man puts his pistol done after the shootout. His use of a shotgun as a primary weapon means that accuracy is not as critical, allowing for him to aim via sound rather than sight. When Eli and Solara approach the cannibals' (George and Martha) house. As they approach the steps, you can hear a brief clicking sound. Eli is using echolocation to "see" what is ahead of him.George asks Eli about the No Trespassing sign, "Can't you read the sign?" Eli responds, "Didn't see it." -When paying for his trickle charge, he opens a Zippo lighter and passes his hand over the flame to ensure it indeed was lit instead of seeing the flame.

There is a person in the Bible named Eli; he is a highly-devoted priest and, like the movie's main character, he is not born blind, but becomes blind later in life (1 Samuel 3:2).

Throughout the film, it is said that Eli's Bible is the only one remaining. After the newly printed Bible is put on the shelf, beside it, there is a book with a Hebrew headline saying "Tanach." Tanach is the Hebrew Bible, the Old Testament of the King James version, meaning part of a Bible was already found, but it's likely no one knew how to read it.

Aside from the film's title, Eli is identified by name only three times. Once, when it appears on a K-Mart name tag inside his backpack, again when Eli introduces himself at Alcatraz Island, lastly on the "head stone" in the end sequence.

Keeping with the film's ideas of religious faith and belief, there is symbolism in the scene where Redridge executes the guard who didn't stop Eli's escape; the guard is shot in the head in front of the corner of two walls, and when the blood spray goes across the walls and down the border of them, it forms the shape of a cross.

The Bible is printed in braille. When Carnagie finally obtains the book he proclaims "He can't be!" Referring to the fact that Eli is blind.

Eli carries a King James Bible that he reads every day, and when he quotes Psalm 23, he quotes it as a New King James Version. Also shown at the end when they are done with transcribing and printing to book.

In the cave scene with Solara, Eli explains that the sun came through the sky to the Earth. This was a reference to the depletion of the ozone layer caused by the war.

The eyes of the biblical Eli, according to 1 Samuel 3:2, "...were becoming so weak that he could barely see..."

During the final act of the film, Eli's voiceover is a prayer monologue. He paraphrases in his own words King James version of 2nd Timothy 4:7.

British-born actors Gary Oldman and Malcolm McDowell have both starred in sci-fi films with settings in an alternate, historical version of San Francisco, Ca. "Dawn of the Planet of the Apes" (2014) and "Time After Time" (1979), respectively. Each film had a grim premise for the city's population.


User reviews

Sharpbrew

Sharpbrew

Upon first viewing the trailer I was immediately giddy to see a new post-apocalyptic film in the vein of The Road Warrior. Being a fan of the genre, one must get used to the repetitive "lone wanderer" theme so prominently used. I figured this film would go through the same formula, but prepared to enjoy myself.

Yes it did use the lone wanderer as a driving plot device, and yes it did bring the arbitrary twist. Yes all the survivors are short on t-shirts, but live in a wealth of leather and goggles. Yes everything in this film looks like and feels like a typical post-apocalyptia. But the substance of the story is far more powerful then I could ever have expected.

Without giving away too much, yes the film is essentially a Christian metaphor. Eli seems to be protected by some mysterious force, guided by "God" to head west. But it's what the meaning behind this admittedly bizarre plot that makes this film so great. It truly is a film about faith and believing in one's self. Using the dreary post-apocalyptic backdrop, the film is able to contrast this powerful message with the harsh landscape. Even amidst such despair, one can rise and accomplish anything. In a world slowly becoming apocalyptic itself, this message is much welcomed.

The other aspects lending to the power of The Book of Eli are its technical aspects. The cinematography is simply beautiful. Moody slo-mo shots abound with wonderfully toned colors. Everything looks dark and dead, the sun beating down endlessly on the dusty dunes. The soundtrack adds immensely to this feeling, using soft ambient chords and blasting action-scene drums when necessary. Overall The Book of Eli is an excellent film itself and an excellent spin on the post-apocalyptic genre.

Oh yeah, and Denzel Washington actually manages to pull off the part of a wizened, old bad ass.
IWAS

IWAS

The Book of Eli has the potential to be a great film or complete rubbish depending on your expectations of what is to come. If you are looking for a film with some deeper meaning then I would not recommend it. However, if you are looking for a film with beautiful cinematography, solid acting and a little bit of fun action then you will be pleased.

The key in watching the film is to not buy into the plot too much, which is where the viewer is going to be disappointed. The ending is a little far fetched and I couldn't help but roll my eyes. Although I honestly don't see a particularly good ending for the basic premise of the film.

If you are able to put the silliness with the story behind you, the film is wonderfully done. There is great camera work with interesting angles and framing; the set showcases the contrast between the stark light of the sun and the shadows where humankind is hiding; and the acting makes you want to buy into the characters and their conflicts.

I would recommend seeing the film, just don't get too involved with the story. Instead concentrate on the acting and the scene.
Dordred

Dordred

Everybody's talking about what happens after the apocalypse these days. "The Book of Eli" is sort of the boiling point of this science-fiction concept, a combination of last year's "The Road" and George Miller's "The Road Warrior." America is a post-apocalyptic wasteland and Denzel Washington is the only self-sufficient badass. So originality is not exactly "Eli's" calling card, but it clearly establishes its ruinous world and the Hughes brothers ("From Hell") take good care of its characters while supplying top-notch action. Washington stars as our stolid protagonist, Eli, journeying westward with his canteen, a large machete, a couple guns and a special leather-bound book. He lives on an Earth that was fried 30 years before by the sun because of a war that ripped a hole through the ozone layer. Sun-goggled bikers run amok pillaging, killing and raping passers-by, yet Eli is morally sound and focused on keeping his book safe no matter what so he can deliver it somewhere out west. Although written by a first-time screenwriter and former PC Gamer editor, Gary Whitta, "Eli" impressively creates its world between the sunglasses/goggles due to the sun's power, trading of goods because money's obsolete and the constant examining of hands to determine if someone is jittery from eating too much human flesh. Whitta also places Eli squarely in the story. He's a good but dangerous man who's not afraid to kill, and as he sits idly by as a couple gets attacked, it's abundantly clear that this is a world where compassion is secondary to survival and self-interest. Where the plot comes in is "Eli's" weak link. It doesn't try too hard to hide just what exactly the book is and that sort of dissolves some of the film's mystique. The plot is essentially Eli wants to protect it and take it west and he has a run in with Carnegie (Gary Oldman), an older man who runs a small town and desires it for selfish power-related reasons. Along the way, anyone who threatens to lay a hand on Eli gets sliced up or shot. In the two or three fight scenes where he takes down numerous guys at once, you can't help but wonder why after he kills the first few guys, the others don't run the hell away, especially considering people are otherwise in self-preservation mode living in a wasteland (and they know nothing of the book). The Hughes brothers make those scenes worthwhile, however. There's a style and grace to their action scenes -- they create a sort of a moving tableau in some scenes and execute a wide range of tempos in the action sequences to make them more intense. When Carnegie's men encounter Eli and the young woman (Mila Kunis) that he inspires who follows him at the home of some old folks (cameos by famous Brits Frances De La Tour and Michael Gambon), they place the camera in the middle of the action and sweep along with the gunfire (part- digitally) from one side to the other. It's very cool and is an example of one way the Hugheses keep the focus away from the plot's shaky skeleton. I only have beef with their excessive slow-motion walking-toward-the-camera shots and showing a bit too much of the cloudy green-gray sky. Some people are going to be more surprised and impressed with the film's big reveal than others, but anyone with a love of action and that post-apocalyptic context will find something to make "Eli" a worthwhile watch regardless of plot weakness. Washington is slightly under-utilized but he's an ideal fit. He brings an intensity in his demeanor that makes him an intriguing character and the film does a good job of making his character more central than anything else. ~Steven C
Mbon

Mbon

I am always hesitant when movies come out in January or February. The Oscar buzz is about last year's performances and the summer blockbusters are still five months away. So, when movies come out this time of the year there is a distinct possibility that the movie is going to have a weak story line and sub par acting. This is not the case with "The Book of Eli." For a January movie — it exceeded my expectations.

I have respect for both Denzel Washington and Gary Oldman and their choice of past roles. Gary's role in this film was that of the old bad guy running a small western front town 30 years after a nuclear war (I am assuming it was nuclear war, they only vaguely described what happened). He sends his traveling bandits out of town to find the last Bible on earth. He does this because with the last Bible on earth he can reestablish civilization under his reign. It does seem far-fetched but then again it is a January movie so I will cut it some slack. Gary did a great job, reminded me a little of his bad guy character in "The Professional," but he wasn't over the top with his acting, only when he needed to be.

On to Denzel, who did another great job. He reminded me of Clint Eastwood in his western movies where he didn't say much because he didn't have to. Denzel's actions spoke for him. That leads us into the action sequences. The Hughes Brothers delivered the action with a wallop and without a lot of blood and guts. The first fight scene looked like five silhouettes fighting a shadow of a man. There's also a shoot out scene where they used some pretty innovative camera shots to put the viewer into the action. The action was quick and to the point and just as important, it was memorable.

We covered the actors and the action, so what about the story? The story could have taken place in the Old West just as it could have taken place in an apocalyptic future. It was simple and didn't have many confusing elements to it. The premise was to get that Bible. Denzel's job was to head west to deliver the last copy of the Bible to someone. He does everything in his power to protect the book. Since the Bible is the main focus of the hunt there are some religious overtones but nothing too heavy. There is also a good use of humor, something totally unexpected considering the drabness of the film.

The camera helped in telling much of the story. Through much of the movie the camera and landscape was all that was needed to carry key elements in the story. In one scene Mila Kunis' character was attacked and instead of talking about it afterward, the camera took time to focus on her reaction to the situation. There are also several shots of Denzel walking in the desolation showing the audience the ruined landscape. Dialogue couldn't have added much more.

Should you see this movie? Yes. Even though it won't get Oscar nods or be the next big summer blockbuster, it will still keep most people entertained. The ending might make you want to see it a second time to see what you missed the first time. All I am saying is keep your eyes open.
Zaryagan

Zaryagan

With the recent revival of the post-apocalyptic genre in Hollywood, it would be easy to overlook this film, and that would be a mistake. Thirty years from now the world is a barren, desolate wasteland filled with the charred remains of a civilization that destroyed itself through war. In this bleak future a lone man wanders west (Denzel Washington), guided by nothing more than faith, to deliver the last remaining copy of a book that changed the world, and will do so again. While Washington seeks to deliver the book to those who would do good with it, a local warlord (Gary Oldman), an erudite student of Mussolini, wants to possess the book so he can use the words to sway the masses and become a powerful dictator. The characters are very well acted, the action is fluid and well choreographed, and the setting seeps into your skin, immersing the viewer in a world devoid of faith but in desperate need of salvation. The final plot twist is creative, unexpected, and poetically just. The Book of Eli should shoot to the top of your Netflix queue.
mym Ђудęm ęгσ НuK

mym Ђудęm ęгσ НuK

You might be jaded already with a number of big budgeted science fiction films that are set after some apocalyptic disaster that wiped out most of humankind, and having the protagonist become some sole, lonely survivor up against others who have banded together for worse, and without law and order and faced with severely limited resources to survive, cannibalism in a wild wild west environment becomes the order of the day, with those having weapons commanding over those who don't, and a clean bed, warm food, women and clean water are precious, tradable commodities.

I assure you that The Book of Eli, despite what so many others have said, remain refreshing, with Denzel Washington in a charismatic starring role opposite Gary Oldman back to his villainous best, both being top draws in the film. Written by Gary Whitta who had fused key religious elements into science fiction, his effort triumphs against recent others such as Legion, and gets a better execution by the Hughes Brothers Albert and Allen who are sorely missed since their last film From Hell some 9 years ago, a film I enjoyed (despite the butchery here), bringing back their signature way of telling a tale through dark, brooding atmospheres. The first few minutes of the film which introduces Washington's Eli, is nothing short of brilliance relying solely on his enigmatic, silent presence, clearly surpassing that of Will Smith's turn in I Am Legend.

Washington's Eli is what carries the film, a man fixated in his sole mission for some 30 years already, doing so based on one word - faith and a vision and instruction given unto him. He's the modern day missionary, executing his god-given task without question, believing that he fulfills his calling with as little fuss as possible. He truly believes that he's being protected from harm, and of course that also meant through the use of a shotgun, pistol and one hack of a machete (pardon the pun and intentional misspelling), dispatching bandits like spreading butter on warm toast. As such he's indestructible almost, giving himself some reputation into a small town he wanders into, especially when he has in him a possession of the titular book that seems to hold the hope to mankind's salvation.

And Gary Oldman's Carnegie is the anti-thesis to Eli the messenger. For Carnegie, possession of the book is key for his power consolidation, because being able to influence the weak, the desperate and those in despair, would translate to loyal obedience. And in some ways this is quite true, in the way the power and influence religion has over the masses. In fact, Carnegie's explanation to Eli on the need for the book, is something which you'll find hard to dispute about, because even if one aspires to be a false prophet, one will require firstly the scriptures from which to twist from, since groping verses from the air just doesn't cut it even to the simple minded.

As seen in films like There Will Be Blood, false prophets are abound, and this is one of the stronger aspects of the film blatantly made so explicit. You cannot help but to think about the same concept in today's context, where one's perceived knowledge and ability would bring about tremendous power and followers because of the seeding of hope and salvation in one's mind, and top marks given if one can influentially enslave the mindsets of desperate others through faith, something which Eli also has problems trying to explain to his new follower of sorts, Solara (Mila Kunis).

For action junkies, you'll not be left out by the handful of battle sequences, where the hand to hand combat scenes have Washington showing off what he had learnt from a student of Bruce Lee, and reportedly doing so without the use of a stunt double. And if slicing and dicing opponents in close quarter combat is not your cup of team, there are also those which are laden with gun fights that just rip everything apart in their way, although I prefer the more elegant alternative of the use of the bow and arrows, with the Hughes Brothers knowing a thing or two about shooting proper action sequences that you can actually follow comfortably.

Testosterone-laden action aside, In some ways the film also touches upon the importance of culture, without which we're reduced to nothing but savages, knowledge being buried in books and encyclopedias that no longer exist save for those still in collective memory. The final act, together with its sucker punch makes it all the more satisfying and poignant even, giving you compelling reason to want to watch this a second time with that little bit of background knowledge to observe performance and nuances that had probably gone unnoticed. That said, there are still a minor loophole here and there, but as Eli puts it, it's accredited to nothing more than faith. Highly recommended!
iSlate

iSlate

I have to agree with one reviewer that stated the movie should have ended with the shot of Eli's eyes. Solara becoming the next warrior is ridiculous. The actors were fine but why doesn't Denzel Washington realize that most of the movie doesn't make sense. He uses his bow in the first scene and takes the arrow. After that we don't see where he carries his bow until he needs it later in the film. He has his backpack emptied a couple of times and no shells for his guns or bow is seen. After killing the 2 guys he didn't take his arrows. Eli then tells Solara to take down the bow and wind up the bowstring and he is carrying 1 arrow. In the next scene the bow and arrow are absent. In the opening scene the sky is ominous and an eerie green with particles falling from the sky. At the end of the movie Alcatraz has blue skies, clouds and grass. Am I expected to think it took Eli 30 years to walk across the US? Were those plastic wrapped twinkies that he was sharing with Solara? How would they have tasted 30 years later? Would someone explain how he got out of the locked room (I missed that part)? The house where they were in the shootout with Carnegie and his henchmen was completely full of bullet holes except where the old couple and Eli/Solara were standing. When Solara causes the vehicle she's in to crash how does Eli's blade (which was on the dashboard) get embedded completely to the hilt in Redridge's chest? Is the woman hijacker (with the grocery cart) the same as the second one nearer to the end of the movie? If so how does she get a new gang (since Eli has killed all of her first friends) and get further down the road towards Alcatraz for Solara and Eli to meet again? To have the same ambush using a woman crying with a grocery cart seems lazy to me. Now after dictating the entire bible (with a big hole in his gut/chest) the bible is printed, leather bound and gold leafed only to be placed on a shelf where no one is going to read it. I'm glad for those who enjoyed the movie. It just has too many questionable and unbelievable scenes which caused my frustration. And I wish people would stop comparing this sham of a movie to 'The Road'.
Marige

Marige

The first thing that strikes you about this film is how horrid and beautiful it looks all at the same time. We are in a post-apocalyptic world of washed out colours, destroyed structures and dying people scrabbling to make sure they are not the next to die; and it is a world that is really well designed and really well filmed by Don Burgess. Everything looks convincing and it doesn't feel like they just shot it out in a desert location, it genuinely feels like a scorched earth. The only slight irritant about the look of the film is that it does feel very much like a great copy of the world of Fallout 3 as created by Bethseda – right down to the design of the "bandits" with their goggles and ragged clothing; this bugged me and those very familiar with this world via gaming may also feel the film is "borrowing" rather than creating.

I talk about the look and style of the film first because to me it is really one of the main reasons to watch this film and indeed for the first 20 minutes or so, it is all we are drifting on – this sense of the cool and the barren without much in the way of who's or why's. Unfortunately when the plot does start to come in, it does so with a terribly corny story and message that wouldn't be out of place in one of those overly-earnest low-budget films made by Christian companies. Indeed this is what this film is – an overly earnest religious film, it just happens to have cost millions and have massive Hollywood stars involved in it. Now, this is the point where you assume that I dislike the film because it is to do with God and the bible, but this wasn't it all at – it didn't help for sure, but this isn't the reason.

The main problem I have is that the film doesn't actually seem interested in making this message work and the plot just seems like a necessary evil to get the character walking in slow-mo around this cool landscape. There isn't much development beyond the basic dialogue about the power of this book and it is nothing but endless corn in the main; I may have respected it more if it had done something with the content, but it doesn't, indeed it seems almost embarrassed by it. The Hughes Brothers for sure aren't particularly interested in that and thus the performances and shots are all about the style, the atmosphere and the look of the film. Accordingly the cast do the same – which is fine because I wonder why they were all queuing up to be in this story. Washington is a great lead because he is all style and presence and he fits the landscape well. Kunis' character makes less sense as she goes on but she is stunning to look at and again fits the style aspect of the film. Oldman's villain is poor and as a result he is only OK.

What all this leaves then is a film that should be watched by fans of Fallout 3 and New Vegas, simply because it is a great film recreation of those worlds, from the colour of the sky down to the costumes it feels and looks like the games. Outside of this though, the casual viewer is left with very little of interest going on behind the style; the story is cloyingly religious and lacking any insight or intelligence – in terms of writing it feels like having two guys at your door trying to sell Jesus to you with platitudes and clichés. It all looks fantastic but unfortunately the script simply doesn't deserve the visuals.
Oppebro

Oppebro

This tale is one of a kind. I love the cinematography, acting, lighting, music, and sound. Watching the trailer i though it may be just another action film with no substance, boy was i wrong. Throughout the years Christianity has been skewed and manipulated to control the masses. This film demonstrates the good in spirituality in sharp contrast to the bad. Classic light against dark.

And it delivers on the action. One fight scene shot is contrast had me jumping out of my seat. This is just good film making. The Color dazzled my eyes. The sound sent shivers down my spine.

This film does not preach, and is an eerie warning of our future. We are the stewards of the earth and need to take responsibility for the people around us. Help others more than yourself. The lessons of the bible can be taken in may ways, Choose to take what is good and disregard the rest.

Bottom line, this film is masterfully shot. Solid cast that you really become invested in. Beautiful! Definably an Epic of Biblical Proportions.
Hi_Jacker

Hi_Jacker

Few things are hotter this winter than Mila Kunis walking around a post-apocalyptic town in a pair of Aviators. That and a quiet Denzel Washington wielding a sword sets up The Book of Eli, yet another post-apocalyptic thriller set in the future (or lack thereof). The post-apocalypse film may be getting old after films like Children of Men, The Road, I Am Legend, etc., but The Book of Eli manages to keep itself away from the cliché apocalypse film.

Denzel portrays the title character of Eli, a mysterious man who walks around around a destroyed world carrying a book he believes can save humanity. He wanders into a makeshift town where a sadistic villain (Gary Oldman) desperately wants the book. Enter some hacked limbs, explosions, and cannibals, and you got yourself an interesting film.

This is a different role for Denzel. Usually, he's just the calm talker who tries to make sure the bad guys don't do anything crazy (think Inside Man and last summer's remake of The Taking of Pelham 123). However, not only does Denzel do a lot of talking, but he's cutting off people's arms and shooting up the place like he's Jason Statham. One memorable scene involves Eli killing Oldman's men-who are armed with sniper rifles AB machine guns-with a simple handgun.

It's also very refreshing to see Gary Oldman return to the role of a villain. Younger audiences now see Oldman as a good guy after portraying famous literary protagonists such as Sirius Black in the Harry Potter films and Jim Gordon in the recent Batman series. While there's nothing at all wrong with that, I was starting to miss Oldman's villain days, including classic turns as a drug addicted cop in Leon The Professional and a Russian terrorist in Air Force One. Oldman shows his versatility in Eli, where he makes his character a complete psycho.

When I first saw that Kunis was cast in this film, I was a little worried. Sure, everybody loves Mila, but could the star of comedies like That 70's Show and Forgetting Sarah Marshall make the transition in a serious film? Kunis plays her role well, but she should stick with the comedies until she's given a character with more to do.

The Book of Eli isn't perfect with its choppy action sequences or pacing issues, but its a fun film nonetheless. It's films like these that keep the post-apocalyptic genre alive and well.
Goldendragon

Goldendragon

Well, I went to see this film last night not knowing much about the actual plot of it. The start was promising, with some great fight scenes and on the whole, it was well filmed with some great cinematography. Washington played his role well, as did Oldman as Carnegie, however Mila Kunis who anyone who watches 'Family Guy' could tell was the voice of Meg Griffin wasn't good at all. The fact she is the voice of Meg also made me unable to take her seriously, but thats probably just me. I enjoyed the film at the start up until it becomes apparent that 'the book' is in fact the Bible. The fact that the whole film was based around this alienated a lot of people who may be atheist or even if they were Christian, as it was completely hypocritical that Eli killed maybe 100s of people in order to keep the book. Is this in-keeping with Christianity? Well, now the ending. It just about had it for me when we found out that Eli was blind. This put the great fighting scenes that i mentioned earlier in a poorer light for me, as we realised he was supposed to be fighting several people single handedly whilst blind?? Completely ridiculous. as was the fact that he was shot in the stomach, and then 5 minutes later back on the road with some duck tape over the wound. On the whole, its maybe worth seeing if you don't mind contradictory and frankly ridiculous plot twists, hearing Meg Griffin's voice throughout a supposedly tense and serious film and of course, if you don't mind killing 100s of people for the possession of a Bible written in braille.
Beazekelv

Beazekelv

Well, I love apocalyptic movies, because the possibilities to make a good movie are endless. Add to that a "lone wolf" character roaming the wasteland, and things can get even better.

But, what can we do when these Hollywood geniuses decide to dumb down the story to such a low level?

First of all, the Bible is one of the most printed books of human history one can find a copy of it anywhere. If one can find a shotgun and shells, rockets, ray-ban sunglasses, and other things shown in the movie, I am sure that it would be very easy to find a copy of a Bible. OK, maybe the film was an allegory. But still this is plain stupid.

Second, how a Bible would help humans in a post-apocalyptic world? People will need books on agriculture, medicine, metallurgy, etc... It is idiotic to think that all humans need is religion to straighten things out.

Third, with a name like that "Eli" one can guess which is the secret book in the first 30 seconds of the movie...

Fourth, since the book is the Bible how come our "hero", the harbinger of the sacred word, is willing to kill for it? Don't those guys ever learn? What about that message of brotherly love, turn the other face, etc, etc, etc... Only a few chose are deserving of salvation? Come on...

The only positive thing in the movie is that the "Book of Eli" was not the Quran. In these politically correct times we do not know what to expect any more....
Bloodfire

Bloodfire

This 'movie' left me feeling slightly used - by Denzel Washington. It's a bit like battlefield earth, but with God instead of thetans, and Gary Oldman instead of John Travolta (the parallel is fairly loose really, but i think it stands). I'm really not happy being preached to by movies, especially those whose central character fails to live up to anything he tells other people (how Christian is it to cut another mans hand off?). If you're a Christian, don't go to see this movie - it's violent (this violence is seemingly OK, as long as it's a good guy killing people in the name of God, rather than the bad guys killing people - which I find to be a rather worrying message). If you're not a Christian, don't go and see this movie, unless you like being preached to. Go and watch The Road. It's much better.
Dianazius

Dianazius

This movie explains that the Earth was destroyed because of wars of religion and that therefore the survivors destroyed every religious books to prevent from repeating the same disaster. And yet, one man – Eli played by Denzel Washington – who's supposed to be a good man, a wise man chooses to preserve one of these religious books which was partly responsible for almost destroying the Earth!! What's the idea? He expects this time the job will be done correctly and Earth and mankind will be destroyed completely? The Hughes brothers are trying to say that religions are a good thing that can be bad if used by the wrong people (Gary Oldman's character). Which is a stupid message. The good question is: do we need religion to live together? The answer is no because as soon as someone has one religion he rejects anyone having another religion (or no religion at all). Religious tolerance is a myth, it does not exist. Man has invented something better than religions to live together, it's called Laic Democracy. One more thing, Eli hears voices (like Joan of Arc) telling him what to do and the Hughes brothers, who obviously believe in God, implicitly assert that God exists by this subterfuge (since "He speaks to Eli"). Didn't the Hughes brothers ever heard of medical science? Someone who hears voices from God (or anyone else) is not a Saint it's someone who suffers from schizophrenia (a chronic, severe, and disabling brain disorder). By the way, religions do exist, it's a fact. And God does not exist, it's a fact.
Jaiarton

Jaiarton

It started off with such promise, the fight scenes were excellent .... But then the horrible truth dawned on us that the book was the Bible , bearing in mind that the war which destroyed the world was a religious one ! After this point the Movie began to get more and more far fetched and funny "30 years to get to the Midwest ?" then when we realised he was blind ! we couldn't help but laugh :) this how ever explained some things like backing into the shadows to even the fight (not sure how he knew there were shadows there though.) Killing a Cat with a bow and arrow while lying down and erm BLIND ! Shot in the stomach with a 9mm hand gun,then back pack on and off down the road we go?! The end creased us up too, after dictating the entire bible, they reprinted and bound it and placed it in between the Quran and the Torah ! I think the irony was lost on them.
Vareyma

Vareyma

I saw this when it came out in the cinema and quite liked it. Now it has come round on TV I thought it might be worth a second viewing. This film is about the quest of one man to get a book to the place it's supposed to be, to use his words. Now, I'm not a religious man but I can see the value this book might have in a world torn apart by war. It is a post-apocalyptic world, thirty years after it was destroyed. Those that were not killed scratch a living out of what's left, and many have turned to cannibalism. Many were blinded by the flashes in the sky but survived. As stated in the film, after the war people destroyed the bible blaming it for what happened, but Eli has the last remaining copy. Now you know the set-up, here's a brief summary before I give you my thoughts (summary haters please don't touch Eli… not if you want to keep your hands that is… and wait here while I write the next paragraph).

Always moving west, Eli is a loner on the road. Like everyone out there he knows it's a very dangerous place. He kills animals for food and gets clean water where he can. When set upon by hijackers but Eli is a ferocious fighter and thus far has come out on top. One day he wanders into a small town run by Carnegie, a determined man who has been sending out men in search of a particular book, the very one Eli has in his possession. Carnegie has a mother and daughter, Claudia and Solara in his entourage, Claudia was blind from birth, but Solara is sighted. In trying to persuade Eli to stay, as he can see the value of a man who can fight like him, he sends Solara to his room and she discovers the book. Carnegie finds out about the book and sends his henchman, Redridge to get it but Eli has already gone. Eli starts heading west again only to find Solara following him. Redridge wants Solara and makes a deal with Carnegie to get the book in exchange for her. And now the chase is on, will Eli and Solara escape or will they be caught? I think that's enough for now… This film was shot in a similar way to 300 (2006) with a kind of washed out comic book feel to it and, for me, it looked a bit too artificial in places. A lot of the landscapes were CGI which didn't come over too well on TV. Great performances from all of the leading cast, Denzel Washington as Eli, Gary Oldman as Carnegie, Mila Kunis as Solara, Ray Stevenson as Redridge and Jennifer Beals as Claudia. Honourable mentions also go to Frances de la Tour and Michael Gambon as Martha and George, a mad old couple who Eli and Solara find on their travels.

Although it's a fairly straightforward story I found it a very entertaining and compelling film to watch, the 107 minutes went by pretty quickly, which is always a good sign. It did get a bit bogged down in the middle, but redeemed itself with a totally unexpected twist at the end. Don't worry; I'm not going give that away here. Also a haunting soundtrack backs up the visuals to great effect. Over all, although it's not been well received everywhere and although not perfect, it's a good effort… Recommended.

My score: 7.3/10
Ubranzac

Ubranzac

Considered for me so far out of the twelve films I have seen at the cinema in 2010. The Book of Eli is the worst and probably will remain that for the rest of the year. I was looking forward to this movie but it was a pile of rubbish.

Denzel Washington (at his worst) plays the character of Eli who travels across post-apocalyptic America (which is desolate) blind whilst carrying a bible, which he quotes out of. He has astonishing fighting skills with guns, swords and hand to hand combat. He comes across Gary Oldman (who acts just as bad) who plays the principal villain Carnegie. He wants Eli's book as he believes it will help him control the world. At the same time a young woman Solara played by the pretty Mila Kunis who is being terrorised by Carnegie joins Eli.

This movie is crap, the plot is ridiculous with gaping plot holes like we don't find out why America's become a desolate wasteland and there is no back story to Eli's life, which makes him an uninteresting character. Eli talks sanctimonious babble about religion and preserving life, which he dosen't do. In one scene he lets an elderly couple get raped and beaten to death and says to himself he can't help them as he "has to complete his mission" He's meant to be the hero but I didn't like him. He also goes over the top in killing people like one scene in a bar he pushed a man's cat off the bar counter and then when the guy and his friends start on him he slices them to pieces. How pathetic. The action was not exciting as it happens too fast.

The ending as well was completely implausible though I like what happens to Eli as he actually dies! The only things I liked about this film was a cameo from an odd old couple the man played by Micheal Gambon and whose time in the film was unfortunately too brief was entertaining and Mila Kunis was pretty and had some redeeming acting quality, but even that couldn't save this movie. It's one great big turkey.
Mala

Mala

Before seeing this film I read many of the reviews on this site, many of which said it was rubbish and not to waste your time. I disagree with these people i thought it was thoroughly enjoyable from start to end. Good acting yet again from Denzel Washington really made this film. The storyline was really good not a storyline you see in a movie or book very often. And the films visuals were quite impressive, with what the filmmakers thought the Earth would look like after an apocalyptic event.

So the Book of Eli is really about how Gary Oldman's character(Carnegie) is after the last Bible on the earth, this Bible belongs to Denzel Washinghton's character Eli. Eli's mission was to travel west, but He had trouble as Carnegie wanted his Bible, Carnegie and his men put up a fight to get the Bible too.

This Film has plenty of features, in pretty intense action scenes, good acting and visuals, and an amazing twist at the end. Definitely worth watching Rating 8/10
Rigiot

Rigiot

In a very short space of time two post-apocalyptic films have been release, the brilliant The Road which is aiming for Oscar glory, and the action packed The Book of Eli which is appealing for the mass audience.

30 years after a massive war which blow a hole in the sky, possibly a nuclear war, Eli (Denzel Washington) is a lone traveller heading to the West Coast of America. He is a skilled martial artist, armed with guns, a long knife and a bow and is carrying the last King James Bible. On the way he has to avoid and kill hijackers and cannibals. On his travel Eli has to stop off in a ramshackle of a town to buy water and recharge his gear. The town itself run on a barter economy. The leader of the town, Carnegie (Gary Oldman), was impressed by Eli's skill and even more impressed when he found out he can read. Carnegie offer's the traveller a place in his gang. But when Carnegie finds out Eli has the Bible he ends up searching for Eli. The Bible would give Carnegie the ideological based to strengthen his position and expand his power base. Eli goes on the run, hoping to go West and is joined by a young girl Solara (Mila Kunis). He teaches Solara about the Bible and religion and why it is important he goes west.

The best thing about the film is the action. It was slick, stylist, well-edited and at times a fine long fixed shots. There are brilliant moments with the way the camera goes through buildings, and follows the action. The Hughes Brothers have good style as action directors, better then say Michael Bay or McG who throw everything at the camera.

The story is not that original, there are elements of likes like Mad Max 2 and 3, The Road and the Man With No Name trilogy. But there are interesting ideas, the use of religion as political ideology, the use of religion as political control and showing both the good and bad sides of faith. Most films only show one side of the other: but this does both and I can praise it for that. I think given a bit of fine tuning then this could have been a really good script.

As mentioned, the Hughes brothers have style as action directors, but they also filmed in a slightly washed out look, giving the film a more given a gritty, earthy feel. It doesn't camp it up like the third Max Mad film did. They pacing was good for the most part and allow you to get to the character as well as seeing the action. However some moments did drag the film and could have been sped up. Others just didn't fit, like the slightly comical scene with an elderly couple played by Frances de la Tour and Michael Gambon. 10 to 15 minutes could have been cut.

Denzel Washington is possibly one of the coolest actors in the world. He was well cast as the protagonist, and since the character is a bit older then usual action hero Washington was the right age for the film. Gary Oldman does his use villainous role he is normally good at, look at his roles in True Romance, Leon, the Fifth Element and Air Force One. He gives his character a young Jack Nicholoson quality, though my brother said he reminded him of Bill the Butcher from Gangs of New York. He was good as he normally is. However whilst Mila Kunis is easy on the eye, her performance was weak and wooden. She wasn't believable as a young girl looking for a way out and able to grow as a character. At least she has Family Guy to fall back on. Other smaller roles were also not as convincing as the lead roles.

This was a decent film, but there was room for improvement.
Zepavitta

Zepavitta

I only write reviews for movies that I really hate or really love, and "The Book of Eli" definitely falls into the latter category. It's an intriguing tale about a man in post-apocalyptic America walking west to deliver an initially unnamed book. The fact that he's been doing so under the most bleak of circumstances for 30 years is a testament to his strong faith and determination to complete the task. The movie has a good amount of action...Eli can handle himself and takes down any of the deranged lunatics who try to get in his way in crowd pleasing fashion. The core of the movie occurs when he stops at a small town ruled by Gary Oldman's evil character and his merciless motorcycle riding thugs. The ensuing confrontation is yet another test of Eli's faith. The movie contains a surprise ending that will make you say, "WTF"??? and is absolutely impossible, but makes you think back over the entire film and want to watch it again. Denzel Washington, as Eli, is outstanding and he exhibits the amazing charisma he brings to all of his roles. The movie is well cast, and it was great seeing the fine Jennifer Beals ("Flashdance") on the big screen again. The Hughes Brothers are excellent directors, and I love the diversity of their body of work, from "Menace to Society" to "From Hell". This is a movie that I will be seeing again.
Phalaken

Phalaken

Although I tried to keep this as spoiler-less as possible, I am going to give a warning that this review hints at parts you might want to view for yourself.

Plot:

The Book of Eli (2010) paints a dystopic view of the future: the United States lays barren and dry after an apocalyptic war. Sharing a common theme with the movie Mad Max (1979), the roads are controlled by raiders and looters making travel dangerous. Despite this, Eli (Denzel Washington) takes a personal mission to deliver a book to an unknown location "West". His journey eventually brings him to a small settlement where his mission, his book and his life are threatened.

Pros:

(+) Visually Spectacular: A lot of thought was put into the detailing of lighting and colour themes. Also, the panoramic views are a nice treat for the eyes and imagination.

(+) Well-paced Action Sequences: Whenever there was a conflict, Denzel Washington never failed to deliver an exhilarating show. In particular, there was one unbroken fight scene near the beginning which should impress you.

(+) (Mostly) Well-paced Story: During the majority of the length of the movie, the plots and events that transpire are delivered in a nicely concise and deliberate fashion. Personally, I felt every scene (until up to the ending) contributed and not a single second of screen time was wasted.

(+) Serious Tone/Themes: Although the themes here are definitely controversial, the movie's mature tone and believable setting should be enough to get one to provoke some serious thoughts. Some might be impressed upon by the religious themes while others might be touched by the message of the importance of preserving knowledge. In any situation, the movie does leave an impact on the viewer and I believe that should be celebrated.

Cons:

(-) Unnecessary Plot Device: If you watched the movie, you probably already know what I'm hinting at. There's one glaringly important aspect of the Eli character that is supposed to be shocking to the viewers. However, in practise, it turns out to be highly unnecessary and unrealistic to the point where its somewhat gimmicky.

(-) Plot Shield a Little Too Apparent: The definition of a character protected by the "plot shield" (too vital to the plot than to be killed/harmed) fits Eli a little too well. There are scenes where bullets downright dodge Eli. And with the movie's serious tone, you will definitely find it difficult to suspend belief in realism to ignore this problem.

(-) Heavy Christian Themes: Now, before I start on this, I want to stress that this is may not necessarily be a negative. If you're a Christian, this will be nice treat of a movie for you. As a Christian, I found the movie's themes somewhat refreshing. However, I completely understand atheists or people of other faiths may be uncomfortable with the ideas discussed in this movie. And their feelings are justifiable: the movie positively advertises Christian beliefs and practises to a surprisingly large extent.

Recommendation: Before you view this movie, just know that Christian themes are delivered with a heavy hand. If you are Christian, that's great; watch the movie and enjoy the religious themes. If you are agnostic/open-minded atheist, I would suggest you try to separate yourself from the religious themes and focus more on the idea that Eli is just a man on a journey trying to protect knowledge that is precious to him. Although his mission might not touch you personally, try to imagine how it might affect Eli personally and his belief on what is truly important to him. Finally, if Christianity REALLY isn't your cup of tea, avoid this movie. The extent to which it celebrates the Christian faith might offend you (and I wouldn't blame you if it did).
Tiainar

Tiainar

I've always liked The Hughes Brothers. From Menace II Society to Dead Presidents to American Pimp to From Hell, they are amazing filmmakers. That said, The Book Of Eli separates itself from their other films. This is not to say this is a good thing. See, The Book Of Eli lacks what The Hughes Brothers usually have. Examples of what those are-characters, a story, a plot, good acting, good direction, entertainment value, ETC. Look, I could go on and on of how bad of a film The Book Of Eli is. From its boring, stupid, absurd set up to its final, terrible, rip off final twist, The Hughes Brothers, as much as their other films have amazed me, have made an undeniably bad film. Denzel Washington is supposed to be a bad ass at the end of the world, and Gary Oldman is supposed to be the evil gang member who wants Washington's magical book. Mila Kunis is the daughter of Oldman who follows Washington. However, the actors are so painfully dull that none of them can pull of their roles, and the roles, along with the movie becomes stupid and boring. As for the twist, even if the movie was amazing, the last 5 minute twist would have made me hate the movie anyway. Avoid this movie at all costs, and I mean all costs.
Wenes

Wenes

To be honest i thought i was going to enjoy this film. I was strongly wrong however. This is Washingtons worst role to date and a thorough let down on all sides technically. The Book of Eli was stupid as well as idiotic in that nothing made sense. The action, dialogue and casting was absolutely out of place and didn't serve any meaning or emotional response from me. It had this tone of being an MTV style movie that looked tacky and out place. And why did Gary Oldman want to take part in this gruelling and underly layered flop? I mean, he starred in The Dark Knight so surely seeing the quality of that compared to this he should have easily said no. But obviously not.
avanger

avanger

Denzel carried this out without a hitch. I am never disappointed with seeing him in action. I think he is one of the best actors and brought this movie to life. The plot was quite interesting as well, for me the movie had a philosophical message that can be interpreted as spiritual yet satirical at the same time. Satirical in the way it identified the role of the bible in today's society. It also highlights the power of the spoken and written words in combination with faith in times of crisis. I definitely suggest watching it! 2 thumbs up! This film carries a certain character that is sometimes lacking in Hollywood films. It seems to be a combination of Western, action, drama etc all combined in a futuristic yet historical way. I went to watch it with a friend and we were both enthralled and inspired by Eli. A must watch for movie goers!
Ckelond

Ckelond

This is a thought-provoking and poignant story that happens in an oppressive and odd far world , a strange and terrifyingly abandoned society . This stirring movie in comic-strip style is packed with unbelievable fighting , car stunts , thrills , chills and noisy action with a starring who has been wandering westward across America for the last thirty years . Violent movie about a futuristic road-warrior named Eli ( Denzel Washington ) , whilst surviving by hunting animals , he carries a famous book who guards closely , some will kill to have it , he will kill to protect it . Later on , Eli travels along with a young girl (Mila Kunis) seeking goods in destroyed places and articles to trade in markets for water and supplies , they undergo a dangerous journey towards San Francisco , Island of Alcatraz . This flick is set a few years from now , a dangerous, desolate post-industrial world of the future where rules the strongest law . This post-apocalyptic tale, in which a lone man fights his way across America in order to protect a sacred book that holds the secrets to saving humankind . It concerns about a peculiar prophet , when the nasties attack , rape, ravage to hapless and unfortunates , Eli defend them . A group (commanded by the warlord named Carnegie , well played by Gary Oldman) along with his hoodlums (Ray Stevenson) located at an old city is looking for the unique Biblic book . Eli'll have to fight against the cutthroats, a band of depraved crazies thirsty for blood and survive some battles to-the-death with lots of blood and gore, including throating-slit , slashing , impaling and blow up . The vengeance will be terrible against some bands of depraved crazies thirsty for blood on destroyed roads .

This exciting post-apocalypse picture packs kinetic action , thrills, chills , shocks and abundant violence . It's an intriguing type of story with Science-Fiction leanings and stretching rather far for some of the plot points . This cerebral picture is full of cinematic and Biblic references including a religious message . The interesting story , generally fast-moving , mingles the genres of Dystopian science fiction and thrilling film . It contains an intelligent and surprising ending with the protagonist staying in idyllic exile and carrying out his divine mission . Set far in the future , there are great special effects and elaborate sets . Spectacular stunt-work plenty of impressive fights , cars with bounds and leaps and explosions . Top-notch Denzel Washington as revenger angel at one of his best last roles , he embarks a spectacular crusade against vicious murderous . Good support cast who makes fine performance as Gary Oldman , Jennifer Beals , Evan Jones , Tom Waites and Michael Gambon . Moving as well as sensible musical score fitting to action and drama is stunningly composed by means of synthesizer . Special and weird futuristic atmosphere created by cameraman Don Burguess who reflects splendidly the barren outdoors . The motion picture produced by the great producer Joel Silver , is stunningly directed by the Hughes brothers, Albert and and Allen , authors of good films as ¨From hell¨ and ¨Dead Presidents¨ and of course ¨The book of Eli¨ . Here they blend ¨Mad Max¨ trilogy style along with ¨Farenheit 451¨ final premise . Rating : Good , better than average, this is one of the most successful Hughes Brothers . This remarkable action film will appeal to Science Fiction buffs. Rating : 7 , Above average . Well worth watching